期刊论文

Analysis on Preference Logic of Appraisal Decision-making in Collegial Panel

中文

重庆理工大学学报(自然科学)

1674-8425

2014

28

3

22-25+57

10.3969/j.issn.1674-8425(s).2014.03.005

教育部人文社科项目＂司法裁判中法官理性实现的逻辑分析＂（10YJCZH039） 湘潭大学诉讼法学研究中心开放课题＂民事裁判的博弈分析＂（12fx005）的阶段性成果..

本校为第一机构

合议庭的评议是审判运行机制中的最核心部分,其合理运作直接决定着审判制度功能的发挥.构建一个科学、合理的评议程序是实现司法裁判结果公正、合理的有效保障.我国有关评议制度的法律规定本身并不健全,合议庭评议规则存在漏洞.合议庭可将各法官对某案件态度的偏好汇集成群体偏好,然后做出优劣排序或从中选优而形成一个总的裁判决策.

The deliberation of collegiate bench is the central part of the trial operation mechanism, which will directly determine the operation of the judicial system. Constructing a scientific and reason- able evaluation program is the effective safeguard that realizes fair and reasonable judicial referee re-suits. The law on deliberation system in China itself is not sound, because there are loopholes in eval-uation rules. The collegiate bench condenses all individuals＇ preferences of judges into group prefer-ence and arranges in order or select...